As in 1800, there's been a barrage of mudslinging in the final days of the 2010 election. Here's the most outrageous to date:
In the 9th District where Republican Todd Young is challenging incumbent U.S. Rep. Baron Hill: A TV ad by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee says Young “has a history we can't trust” because he worked for “a radical Washington interest group.” The group? A highly regarded think tank, the Heritage Foundation, one of the leading promoters of free enterprise and conservative principles. The ad is despicable deception.
In Indiana's 2nd District congressional race, an ad backing Democratic incumbent Joe Donnelly says Republican challenger Jackie Walorski “wants to eliminate Pell Grants,” which help lower-income students pay for college, and “abolish the entire Department of Education.” Although Walorski has spoken out against expansion of federal programs not expressly authorized by the Constitution, she's not on record for either position. The ad isn't honest.
In the U.S. Senate race, a Dan Coats advertisement says Democrat Brad Ellsworth “voted with Nancy Pelosi to force seniors into Barack Obama's government-run health care program.” Politi Fact.com, which screens political ads for fairness, gave Coats its lowest possible “pants on fire” rating for this. It not only distorts the impact of the health care reform law but capitalizes on public confusion about Medicare. The ad isn't fair.
These are just a few of the negative ads in circulation, and they deserve public scrutiny because they reveal so much about the character of the candidates that resort to them. On the bright side? None meets the standard of 1800, when Jeffersonians accused Adams of being a monarchist and an Anglophile, and Federalists called Jefferson a godless unbeliever and a witch.Talk about micromanaging. Florida voters are being asked to relax public school class size caps that were placed into the Constitution in 2002. The cost to implement the caps has reached $16 billion, even as school enrollments across the state have slowed along with the economy. If 60 percent of voters approve the amendment, it will take effect retroactively to the beginning of this school year.
One reason Florida has so many ballot questions is that its Constitution is so easy to amend. A resolution passed by both houses of its legislature is all it takes to bring an issue to the voters. In Indiana, a proposed amendment must be passed by two consecutive, separately elected sessions of the General Assembly, a requirement designed to protect the Constitution from the whims of any given election year.
Twenty-six states — Indiana not among them — allow voters to propose new laws or constitutional language, a privilege that can lead to abuse. For example, Denver voters will get to decide whether to create “an extraterrestrial affairs commission” to prepare the city for possible encounters with space aliens.
On Nov. 2, voters in 36 states will consider a total of 155 ballot measures, 42 of them initiated by citizens. By the way, Indiana's constitutional amendment process is considered the most restrictive of all 50 states.