Protecting marriage gets the business
The battle over the future of marriage in Indiana has boiled over from the political and cultural battlefields into the business boardrooms.
One fallacy, Chick-Fil-A’s record-setting sales day notwithstanding, is that preserving the importance of having both a husband and a wife in marriage is bad for business. It is an opinion that came from a book by Richard Florida called “The Creative Class.” When the Wall Street Journal reviewed Florida’s theory, they dismissed it as “economic snakeoil.”
Marriage has a great number of business benefits. Married men have stronger employment status than cohabiting men. Men’s productivity increases by 27 percent as a result of marrying. Women in intact marriages have a higher income-to-needs ratio than women in any other family structure.
Dr. Jennifer Morse of the Ruth Institute notes, “The family is absolutely necessary for the market to function. The substitutes to the family are expensive and ineffective, and taxpayers end up paying the price.”
As to the claim that the 31 state marriage-protection amendments create bad business environments, there are numerous job studies that debunk this lie: The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis ranked states for per capita personal income growth from 1999 to 2009. Eight of the top 10 states for best personal income growth have passed Marriage Protection Amendments. None have same-sex marriage or civil unions.
CEO Magazine surveyed 543 chief executive officers, asking them to rank the best and worst states for business and job growth. All of the top five have marriage-protection amendments. The worst five business-environment states were California, New York, Michigan, New Jersey and Massachusetts, the first state to allow the unraveling of marriage.
In February, Kiplinger Financial Magazine named the top 10 states for predicted job growth in 2012. Every one of the top five states have marriage-protection amendments.
This fall, CNBC profiled “America’s Top States for Doing Business” using input from the National Association of Manufacturers and the Council on Competitiveness. Nine of the top 10 business-friendly states have marriage-protection amendments. None has same-sex marriage. Those states with same-sex marriage landed toward the bottom of their business performance data.
In spite of this easily obtainable data, the myth that respecting marriage is bad for business continues to be repeated.
executive director, American Family Association of Indiana
This letter is to express my hope that my home will be receiving water, billing and service from Fort Wayne City Utilities in the near future.
I have a separate line for my lawn, which I am overcharged for having it turned on, and I was not always able to fully utilize this past summer due to lack of water and or water pressure. My bills never reflected that, but the high and ambiguous minimum charges for both water and sewer were ever-present.
Minimum sewer charge $26.97 and sewer charge $38.97 with no correlation between amount of water used and sewer charges. Water has its own set of rules for minimum charges.
Aqua seemingly has a green light to raise rates, add on charges and minimums with not enough consideration for the quality and value of their product and is not held accountable for either to the end consumer.