• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
27°
Thursday December 18, 2014
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Local Business Search
Stock Summary
Dow17356.870
Nasdaq4701.8157.5
S&P 5002039.2426.35
AEP58.820
Comcast55.3350
GE24.430
ITT Exelis16.960
LNC55.590
Navistar30.340
Raytheon102.650
SDI20.0750
Verizon46.440

Consumer Reports questions turbocharged engines

Tuesday, February 5, 2013 - 12:34 pm

DETROIT – Consumer Reports is warning car buyers that turbocharged engines may not deliver the speed or fuel economy they expect.

The magazine said Tuesday that its tests showed turbocharged models from Ford, Hyundai and Kia are less efficient than competitors. It also said the turbocharged Chevrolet Cruze got little extra power or fuel economy than a non-turbocharged engine.

The magazine did praise a turbocharged four-cylinder from BMW.

Turbochargers pump extra air into engines so more fuel can be added to boost power. Carmakers charge more for them, promising extra power.

Consumer Reports said a new Ford Fusion with an optional 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine was slower and got lower fuel economy than a Toyota Camry, Honda Accord or Nissan Altima with regular engines.

Ford said it can't speak for Consumer Reports' tests, but its surveys show EcoBoost customers are satisfied with their fuel economy.

A spokeswoman for General Motors Co. says the Cruze turbocharged engine provides more power and better acceleration when compared with the non-turbocharged engine. She said people who drive with a heavy foot on the accelerator of a turbocharged engine won't see a lot of gas mileage benefits.

From The Associated Press