• Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
°
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.

Courting a higher opinion on gay marriage ban

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.The Associated Press
Monday, February 11, 2013 08:29 am
The delay everyone was expecting finally came last week when Republican lawmakers in the General Assembly said they will not take up a proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriage until 2014. Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, and House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, both said they wanted to see how the U.S. Supreme Court would rule on the issue this summer when it considers the legality of Californian’s similar constitutional amendment and the federal Defense of Marriage act that denies benefits to same-sex couples.Most of the stories about the delay threw in a similar line about the reasoning – “wait to see how the Supreme Court will rule” – without bothering to speculate on what that ruling might be. Such analysis might be helpful since the court will affect our own efforts so much.

It is doubtful the court will do anything so sweeping that it would render any Indiana action moot. That would require something like a blanket endorsement of same-sex marriage that all states would be forced to comply with. The court has endured such grief over taking that kind of broad approach on abortion in Roe v. Wade that it’s not likely to repeat the same mistake, especially with the current lineup that leans slightly in a conservative direction.

It’s more likely the justices will take a narrower approach, such as allowing each state to approve same-sex marriages if it wants to, but not requiring other states to recognize them under the Constitution’s full faith and credit clause. (States could also choose not to allow gay marriages, of course.) Such a federalist approach would also argue against the court upholding the Defense of Marriage act.

Until last year, conventional wisdom would have said that four liberal justices would vote to create a “right to gay marriage,” four conservative justices would vote to keep things the same, and the final outcome would depend solely on which side of the bed Justice Anthony Kennedy got up on. But then Chief Justice John Roberts did his surprise switch on Obamacare, so his vote is not quite as predictable as it once was. Now there will be two wild cards in major votes such as these, so be very skeptical of anyone who claims predictive certainty.

The most we can hope for is that the court will let this issue continue to evolve, as it should have on abortion. If the General Assembly acts, Hoosier voters will get a referendum on the amendment in November of 2014. Attitudes are changing on gay marriage, even in conservative Indiana, so that vote won’t be easy to guess, either.

Comments

News-Sentinel.com reserves the right to remove any content appearing on its website. Our policy will be to remove postings that constitute profanity, obscenity, libel, spam, invasion of privacy, impersonation of another, or attacks on racial, ethnic or other groups. For more information, see our user rules page.
comments powered by Disqus