• Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
°
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.

It’s OK to label me as an anti-book banner

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.The Associated Press
Friday, September 20, 2013 12:01 am
Recently, a woman who called herself an “independent conservative” to separate herself from that hairy horde of regressives, called me a “secular progressive,” apparently to deny that she was equally narrow like that horde of right-wing extremists.As a Christian, I take a secular view of the Constitution. If that’s what she meant, it’s OK by me. But the topic is children’s books, which neither of us is willing to censor. She has a list of books that give comfort to conservative book-banners; that is, she “wishes” adult authors of children’s books would not validate every spasm of the teen years.

The only “thing” holding her back is a free market economy, as she views it.

She wishes book publishers would publish only the books she likes for children — that they would operate their businesses for social purposes rather than for profit. Contradiction, huh?

As a father and grandfather, I take an interventionist approach to children’s books, steering mine away from books about sex and horror and degradation and toward books that make moral and aesthetic claims.

Oh, yes, I readily confess. Censorship? Never!

Here’s my point: Many believe our culture is split between left and right on the question of permissiveness regarding what our kids read. In fact, I find there is no such division on the core issues, in spite of what Fox News claims and preaches.

I confess to having “a list” of books that I would steer mine (or a parent) away from reading, but I would never try to impose this on my community (schools, libraries, etc.) — for example, books I read as jingoism, depictions of biblical gender roles as traditional roles in our society, etc.

Finally, it’s OK by me for cons and regressives to label me as an anti-book banner on the left who agrees that books influence our kids and that I prefer some books to others. However, I do not use capitalism as the criterion for that position.

For the record, I feel the same about music, which is more powerful than the printed word. But I’m not a philistine like the hairy horde. I’m not preoccupied or obsessed with sex like the critic who calls me a “secular progressive.”

Comments

News-Sentinel.com reserves the right to remove any content appearing on its website. Our policy will be to remove postings that constitute profanity, obscenity, libel, spam, invasion of privacy, impersonation of another, or attacks on racial, ethnic or other groups. For more information, see our user rules page.
comments powered by Disqus