• Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
°
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.

Letter to the editor: Education 'reform' is hurting our children

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.The Associated Press
Friday, October 11, 2013 12:01 am
How is all this education reform – with its increased testing and decreased funding – affecting the classrooms in schools in Indiana? Experienced teachers who have seen the “before” and are now seeing the “after” of all these “reforms” are feeling increased pressure to ensure that their students score high on these tests. Here are two examples of how classes are coping with these changes:My grandson’s teacher (a kindergarten class) has eliminated second recess. Her explanation: She says new standards are more academic, and her salary depends on high test scores from her 5- and 6-year-olds. So these young learners have only 20 minutes of recess in their full day of kindergarten. This is contrary to research that shows young children need a play time or recess to process all that they have learned.

I know a high school teacher who needs computers in a computer lab for mandatory testing and has 38 students but only 30 computers. There are two problems here – large classes and an insufficient number of computers. The combination of increased testing and less money to pay for additional computers is creating a difficult situation.

Indiana spent $33 million on testing in 2011-2012. The next year that amount was increased to $46 million. In 2011-2012 the state gave out $15 million in vouchers for private schools and increased that amount to $37 million in 2013-2014. These increased expenditures have been made at the expense of students and teachers in public schools.

Our children deserve better!

Susan Berry

Comments

News-Sentinel.com reserves the right to remove any content appearing on its website. Our policy will be to remove postings that constitute profanity, obscenity, libel, spam, invasion of privacy, impersonation of another, or attacks on racial, ethnic or other groups. For more information, see our user rules page.
comments powered by Disqus