• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
36°
Thursday December 25, 2014
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Local Business Search
Stock Summary
Dow18030.216.04
Nasdaq4773.478.05
S&P 5002081.88-0.29
AEP61.311.2
Comcast58.070.17
GE25.83-0.05
ITT Exelis17.820.18
LNC58.58-0.1
Navistar33.81-0.11
Raytheon110.470.29
SDI19.3950.055
Verizon47.670

Letter to the editor: Church and state have different interests concerning marriage

Friday, December 27, 2013 - 12:01 am

Our country is caught up in a push to legalize same-sex marriage. Those of use who are committed to a biblical world view find ourselves on the “wrong side” of public opinion. Political correctness favors the homosexual lifestyle. Some laws exist and more are coming that will punish all those who oppose the various “civil rights” being sought by the homosexual community.

Churches and military chaplains are pressured to accept and bless as “normal” homosexual marriages just as they have blessed heterosexual marriages. How can the state provide for the welfare of all its citizens at the same time allowing the churches to maintain their standards of morality?

It may be remembered that all marriages have been licensed by the state and solemnized by a clergyman, usually in a church, or a judge in his chamber. The state has a complete set of laws governing marriage.

The church has other interests in married couple. A Christian wedding is usually done in a church in the presence of God and before family and church members as witnesses. Every clergyman has the right to agree or to refuse to unite a couple in holy wedlock. His decision is based upon the faith (or lack thereof) of the couple and their readiness to form a home. So far in our history clergymen have not been forced to officiate at the weddings of couples who clearly are not ready for marriage or whose personal moral choices violate God’s laws. There are those in our society who want to force the church to solemnize their vows even though the teaching of the church has opposed (seen as sinful) their proposed homosexual unions.

In view of the fact that the USA cherishes the “separation of church and state,” and the interests of the state in regulating marriages is different from the interests of the church, I propose laws that allow the state to define marriage as it sees fit, but allows churches to have the freedom to choose to only bless or solemnize those unions that conform to their doctrines.

Thus a couple (by any definition) would apply to the state for the legal status of marriage. Upon receiving a marriage permit they would appear before a judge or other duly appointed person for a “civil” marriage. Later this couple may choose to arrange for a Christian wedding in a church of their choice assuming they have met the appropriate conditions set out by that church. There are several countries in the world that have such laws in effect.

The Rev. John Motter, retired