• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
61°
Tuesday September 23, 2014
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Local Business Search
Stock Summary
Dow17055.87
Nasdaq4508.69-19
S&P 5001982.77-11.52
AEP52.56-0.41
Comcast54.97-0.89
GE26.02-0.06
ITT Exelis17.87-0.06
LNC54.37-0.45
Navistar35.38-0.25
Raytheon100.58-1.81
SDI23.89-0.07
Verizon49.91-0.27
DAVE SAYS, A COLUMN BY DAVE RAMSEY

Co-worker not a factor when seeking a raise

Tuesday, August 19, 2014 - 8:41 am

Q.: What’s your advice on asking for a raise at work when you have more responsibility than a co-worker but the same title on paper? After being with my company four years, I feel like I should make more money and I have the right to complain about this. — Vanessa

A.: Sorry, no. You don’t have a right to complain. You agreed on your pay, and you are doing your job the way your character and integrity tell you to do the job. If someone else is a slacker in the same position, that doesn’t mean a whole lot in terms of your personal compensation.

Several people at my company hold similar positions and make similar money. Some of them have been here for years, while others are relatively new. I don’t pay people for how long they’ve been in the building, and I don’t want anyone on my team who doesn’t give 100 percent.

But that kind of thing isn’t your problem. It’s the company’s problem, because she works for them and not you.

If you honestly feel like you deserve a raise because of your effort and performance, that’s fine. Sit down with your leader and make a logical and reasonable argument for why you deserve more money. But don’t bring up your co-worker and what he or she makes in the discussion.

That’s just not relevant. What is relevant is your worth and the value you bring to the organization. But a comparative analysis with someone else on staff just isn’t a good idea.

—Dave

Paying the insurance penalty

Q.: My wife and I live in New York, and we’ve had whole life insurance for several years. There’s a 7 percent penalty if we cash out the policies now. If we wait a few years, we won’t have to pay into the premiums anymore. Should we cash out the policies anyway? — Brian

A.: The reason you won’t have to pay into the premiums anymore is because you built up enough savings, and they are not paying you enough on the savings to amount to anything. The amount they should have been paying you versus the way they were ripping you off will buy the life insurance.

It’s not like you can pay for it because you still have probability of death. As long as there’s a probability of death there’s a cost to life insurance. The only question is whether you’re paying out of your savings account or your checking account. In this case, you’re paying out of savings.

The 7 percent figure is just your surrender charge, so I’d get out of that policy soon.

Here’s the problem, Brian. If you die today, do you know what they’ll pay? Face value. They won’t pay face value plus the savings you paid for. In other words, you’ll lose your savings.

I’d get term life insurance in place by the end of the week. Compare prices on term, because you’ll be surprised at the difference some companies charge for term insurance.

Make sure you get good 15- to 20-year level terms policies valued at 10 to 12 times your annual incomes. —Dave

Dave Ramsey has authored five New York Times best-selling books, including “Financial Peace” and “The Total Money Makeover.” The Dave Ramsey Show is broadcast on more than 500 radio stations. Follow Dave on Twitter at @DaveRamsey and on the Web at daveramsey.com.