• Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Saturday, September 23, 2017
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.

Republicans try linking Donnelly to tax he opposes

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.The Associated Press
Friday, June 01, 2012 02:13 pm
U.S. Sen. Dan Coats and Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock spent a campaign stop Friday attacking Mourdock’s opponent for a health care provision he doesn’t even support.After a tour of the C&A Tool plant in Churubusco, the two Republicans tried to link U.S. Rep. Joe Donnelly, D-Granger, with a tax on medical devices set to go into effect next year as part of President Obama’s health care law.

Mourdock called the 2.3 percent tax on medical devices a “terrible thing that threatens jobs here in Churubusco.”

About 25 percent of C&A Tool’s business comes from making medical devices, such as tools for surgery and prototype artificial joints, owner Dick Conrow said.

But even though Donnelly voted for the health care reform law, he has publicly opposed the medical device tax since 2009 and is co-sponsoring a bill making its way through the House that would repeal the tax.

“Joe co-sponsors the bill to repeal the medical device tax, and I don’t think it’s particularly honest of them to try to assign a different point of view to him,” said Ben Ray, a spokesman for the Indiana Democratic Party.

In October 2009, Donnelly and 16 of his colleagues sent a letter to House leadership in opposition to the $4 billion annual tax. In a statement at the time, Donnelly cited the 18,500 Hoosiers employed by the medical device industry.


News-Sentinel.com reserves the right to remove any content appearing on its website. Our policy will be to remove postings that constitute profanity, obscenity, libel, spam, invasion of privacy, impersonation of another, or attacks on racial, ethnic or other groups. For more information, see our user rules page.
comments powered by Disqus