• Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
°
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.

EDITORIAL: Little help here for elderly and disabled

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.The Associated Press
Friday, July 14, 2017 12:01 am

It can be fun to consider those state rankings that pop up periodically to show how Indiana stacks up in this or that category. They are all instructive. Some give us bragging rights to claim we are better than our nearby states. Some are wake-up calls, letting us know we have some work to do in a certain area.

And some should set off alarm bells loud and clear from Lake Michigan to the Ohio River. Into that category belongs the American Association of Retired Persons' latest report card on providing long-term services and supports for seniors and people with disabilities. Indiana ranks 51st — that's dead last, behind all other states and the District of Columbia.

The survey looks at whether states are adequately providing the kind of help that can make the difference between maintaining a high-quality of life at home and having to move to a nursing home. It considers performances in five main categories: affordability and access; choice of setting and provider; quality of life and quality of care; support for family caregivers; and effective transitions between nursing homes, hospitals and homes.

Indiana ranked 50th or worse in three out of five of the main categories — it was 37th in the quality category and 33rd in effective transitions).

It offers no comfort to observe, as some apologists have, that the quality of care has actually not deteriorated here in the last few years — other states are merely making progress while Indiana isn't.

And it's not enough to say that the state government should be embarrassed to let this happen while it maintains a $2 billion surplus. State action is clearly warranted. As we have noted more than once here, at-home care is both more effective and less expensive than nursing home care, but the state is so invested in nursing homes that it can't bring itself to do the sensible thing. It created an at-home program but then chose not to fund it.

Work is needed in the private sector, too, not to mention a coordinated effort to merge public and private initiatives into a coherent policy aimed at giving some of the state's most vulnerable citizens a better shot at decent lives.

The AARP report doesn't tell us what to do, but it's a warning that we need to start and start right now.

We should all be ashamed.

Comments

News-Sentinel.com reserves the right to remove any content appearing on its website. Our policy will be to remove postings that constitute profanity, obscenity, libel, spam, invasion of privacy, impersonation of another, or attacks on racial, ethnic or other groups. For more information, see our user rules page.
comments powered by Disqus